Centrix Financial, LLC et al v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA et al

Filing 186

ORDER re: 161 Defendants' Objections to Plaintiffs' Counter Deposition Designations for Trial as to Robert Sutton. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 6/5/15. (pabsec)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO By Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Action 09-cv-1542-PAB-CBS In re: CENTRIX FINANCIAL, LLC, et al., CENTRIX FINANCIAL LIQUIDATING TRUST, and JEFFREY A. WEINMAN in his capacity as Trustee for the Centrix Financial Liquidating Trust, Plaintiffs, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA, and AIG DOMESTIC CLAIMS, INC., Defendants. ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFFS’ COUNTER DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS FOR TRIAL AS TO ROBERT SUTTON This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Objections to Plaintiffs’ Counter Deposition Designations for Trial [Docket No. 161]. The Court has reviewed the objections and rules as follows as to the deposition of Robert Sutton: DEPOSITION OF ROBERT SUTTON - 5-15-2014 Item # Testimony Objection 74:18-22 Rule 611: Completeness (requires addition of 74:23-25) 96:17-20 Rule 611: Completeness (requires addition of 96:21-25) 98:14-17 Rule 611: Completeness (requires addition of 98:18-21) 105:19 to 106:5 Rule 611 (Completeness requires addition of 106:6-9) 111:10 to 112:7 Rule 611: Completeness (requires addition of 112:8-20) 114:7-13 Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge) 142:21 to 143:6 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) 147:1-20 Rule 611: Completeness (requires addition of 146:4-25) 162:20 to Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge; Rule 166:16 403: Prejudice (irrelevant as testimony concerns litigation involving two nonCentrix entities); Rule 403: Prejudice (any marginal probative value of whether litigation and settlement between two nonCentrix entities substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice) 175:23 to 177:3 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) 180:24 to 182:5 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements); Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge 202:17 to 203:8 Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge (only related statements made to him by others); Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) 222:4-18 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) 224:1-9 Rule 701: Improper Lay Witness Opinion (calls for an interpretation of a term “financial benefit” that is defined under the bond) Ruling Sustained Overruled Overruled Overruled Overruled Sustained – nonresponsive Sustained Overruled Sustained – foundation Sustained Sustained Sustained Overruled Overruled DEPOSITION OF ROBERT SUTTON - 5-15-2014 Item # Testimony Objection Ruling 231:11-14 Rule 602: Speculation Sustained 235:21 to 236:12 248:20 to 249:18 Rule 611: Vague (mischaracterizes prior testimony) Rule 602: Speculation Overruled Sustained DEPOSITION OF ROBERT SUTTON - 5-16-2014 Item # Testimony Objection Ruling 265:19 to 266:1 Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge (only Sustained relating statements made to him by others); Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) 281:5 to 284:5 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on 281:5-283:20 – hearsay statements) Overruled; 283:21-284:5 Sustained 285:9-17 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on Overruled hearsay statements) 286:8-17 Rule 611: Vague (mischaracterizes Overruled the document) 287:15-18 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on Sustained hearsay statements) 288:1-7 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on Sustained hearsay statements) 302:2-23 Rule 611: Vague Overruled 303:5-13 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) 311:12-16 Rule 701: Improper Lay Opinion (testimony in respect to a defined term under the bond, “personal/financial benefit) 311:17 to 312:1 Rule 611: Vague Overruled 312:22 to 313:1 Rule 701: Improper Lay Opinion (testimony in respect to a defined term under the bond, “personal/financial benefit) 314:13-16 Rule 701: Improper Lay Opinion (testimony in respect to a defined term under the bond, “personal/financial benefit) 317:21-23 Rule 701: Improper Lay Opinion (testimony in respect to a defined term under the bond, “personal/financial benefit) 328:21 to Rule 602: Lacks Personal 329:20 Knowledge, Speculation 338:13 to Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge; 339:22 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) Overruled Overruled Overruled Overruled Overruled Sustained Sustained DEPOSITION OF ROBERT SUTTON - 5-16-2014 Item # Testimony Objection Ruling 370:7-15 Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge, Speculation 370:19 to 371:4 Rule 602: Speculation Overruled 371:6 to 372:5 Rule 611: Vague Overruled 372:6-11 Rule 602: Speculation Overruled 374:16 to 375:19 Overruled Rule 602: Foundation; Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay statements) 382:21 to 383:9 Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge, Speculation 384:8-21 Rule 602: Lacks personal knowledge, Speculation 387:22 to Rule 402: Relevance; Rule 403: Prejudice 395:12 (any marginal probative value is substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice); Rule 404(a)(1): Improper Character Evidence Sustained 408:20 to 409:6 Rule 802: Hearsay (testimony based on hearsay) 410:1 to 411:7 Rule 602: Lacks Personal Knowledge, Speculation 441:5 to 442:14 Rule 802: Lacks Personal Knowledge, Speculation; Rule 611: Vague (mischaracterizes prior testimony) Sustained DATED June 5, 2015. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 5 Sustained Sustained Sustained relevance Sustained Sustained

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?