Bass v. PJCOMN Acquisition Corp. et al

Filing 262

MINUTE ORDER. The following pending motions are DENIED without prejudice as moot: (1) Defendants Motion For Summary Judgment 175 filed April 29, 2011; (2) Defendants Motion To Decertify Conditional Class 176 filed April 29, 2011; (3) Plaintiffs Motion To Consolidate Related Cases 227 filed August 3, 2011; and (4) Plaintiffs Motion To Clarify 253 filed October 25,2011. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/28/2012.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No 09-cv-01614-REB-MEH SHANE BASS, individually and on behalf of other similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, vs. PJCOMN ACQUISITION CORP., PJCOMN LLC, and ESSENTIAL PIZZA, INC., d/b/a “PJCOMN,” Defendants. MINUTE ORDER1 On February 1, 2012, the magistrate judge filed minutes [#261]2 of a telephonic status conference. Those minutes indicate that the parties reported to the magistrate judge that they have reached a settlement in principle that will resolve this case. Pending completion and documentation of that settlement, the following pending motions are DENIED without prejudice as moot: (1) Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment [#175] filed April 29, 2011; (2) Defendants’ Motion To Decertify Conditional Class [#176] filed April 29, 2011; (3) Plaintiffs’ Motion To Consolidate Related Cases [#227] filed August 3, 2011; and (4) Plaintiffs’ Motion To Clarify [#253] filed October 25, 2011. Dated: February 28, 2012 1 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado. 2 “[#261]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?