Smith v. Pizza Hut, Inc.
Filing
377
ORDER granting 375 Expedited Joint Stipulated Motion for Limited Stay Pending Mediation. Status Report due by 12/1/2013. Discovery due by 2/28/2014, Dispositive Motions due by 2/28/2014. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 10/10/13.(bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01632-CMA-BNB
MARK SMITH, individually and on behalf
of other similarly situated persons,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PIZZA HUT, INC.,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the Expedited Joint Stipulated Motion for Limited Stay Pending
Mediation [Doc. # 375, filed 10/9/2013] (the “Motion”). Good cause having been shown,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The Motion [Doc. # 375] is GRANTED;
(2)
Discovery and case deadlines are stayed until December 1, 2013, to allow the
parties an to engage in a mediation;
(3)
On or before December 1, 2013, the parties shall file a status report addressing the
results of their mediation; and
(4)
In the event the mediation does not fully resolve the case, the case schedule is
modified to the following extent:
• Discovery cut-off:
February 28, 2014.
•Dispositive motion deadline;
February 28, 2014.
•Deadine to file motion to
decertify collective action:
February 28, 2014.
• Expert Disclosures:
(a)
The parties shall designate all experts and provide
opposing counsel with all information specified in
Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before January 7,
2014, and
(b)
The parties shall designate all rebuttal experts and
provide opposing counsel with all information
specified in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) on or before
February 7, 2014.
Dated October 10, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?