Schwartz v. Ploughe et al
ORDER Denying Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis on Appeal after Review re 6 Notice of Appeal by Robert Schwartz, by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 08/26/09. (bjrsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01662-ZLW ROBERT SCHWARTZ, Applicant, v. PAMELA PLOUGHE, Warden, and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, Respondents. ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ON APPEAL Weinshienk, Senior Judge Applicant has submitted a Notice of Appeal. Applicant previously was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 in this court in this action. The court has examined the file and has determined that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal must be denied. Pursuant to Rule 24(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith because applicant has not shown the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because this appeal is not taken in good faith. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 26th day of August, 2009. BY THE COURT:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge United States District Court
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?