Walker v. University of Colorado - Board of Regents

Filing 120

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 118 Plaintiff's Motion to Obtain an Injunction to Halt "World Class" Assessment Before Getting "World Class" Funding, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/25/10.(ebs, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01690-PAB-MEH GEORGE W. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO BOARD OF REGENTS, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on October 25, 2010. The Plaintiff's Motion to Obtain an Injunction to Halt "World Class" Assessment Before Getting "World Class" Funding [filed October 22, 2010; docket #118] is denied without prejudice pursuant to D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1H as unintelligible and for failing to articulate the relief the Plaintiff seeks. In the Tenth Circuit, a party requesting a preliminary injunction must clearly establish that: (1) the party will suffer irreparable injury unless the injunction issues; (2) the threatened injury outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the opposing party; (3) the injunction, if issued, would not be adverse to the public interest; and (4) there is a substantial likelihood of success on the merits. Schrier v. Univ. of Colo., 427 F.3d 1253, 1258 (10th Cir. 2005). The burden is on the movant to establish his right to the relief requested. Penn v. San Juan Hosp., Inc., 528 F.2d 1181, 1185 (10th Cir. 1975).