Trujillo v. Plough et al

Filing 40

MINUTE ORDER. The applicants Request For Extension of Time To File Traverse ToU.S. District Court 39 filed 3/23/2011, is DENIED. The applicants request 38 filed 3/23/2011, is GRANTED on the terms stated in this minute order. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/24/2011.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 09-cv-01712-REB JOHN GERALD TRUJILLO, Applicant, v. PAM PLOUGHE, Warden, CTCF, and, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO, Respondents. MINUTE ORDER1 The Petitioner's Motion To Hold Respondents in Contempt of Court For Failure To Comply With a Court Order [#37] filed March 16, 2011, is DENIED. The operative application in this case is the applicant's Amended Application For a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [#8], which supplanted and replaced the original Application For a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [#2]. The respondent's Answer To Application For Writ of Habeas Corpus [#36] addresses, appropriately, the amended application [#8]. There is no basis on which to hold the respondents in contempt based on the fact they address the amended application [#8] in their answer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows: 1. That the applicant's Request For Extension of Time To File Traverse To U.S. District Court [#39] filed March 23, 2011, is DENIED; 2. That the applicant's request [#38] filed March 23, 2011, is GRANTED on the terms stated in this minute order; and 3. That the Clerk of the Court shall send to the applicant a copy of the court's Order on Motions To Reconsider [#28] entered September 10, 2010. Dated: March 24, 2011 This minute order is issued pursuant to the express authority of the Honorable Robert E. Blackburn, United States District Judge for the District of Colorado. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?