Glaser v. Kentwood Company Cherry Creek, LLC, The et al

Filing 82

ORDER. Defendants Forthwith Motion for Stay of Execution of 12/22/2009 Order Regarding [Pro Se Plaintiffs] Motion To Compel Responses To Interrogatories (Docket No. 68) 80 filed 01/07/2010, is GRANTED. The requirements of the Order Regarding [Pro Se Plaintiffs] Motion To Compel Responses To Interrogatories (Docket No. 68) 75 filed 12/22/2009, are STAYED pending resolution of the defendants objections 76 to the order of the magistrate judge. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 01/08/2010.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-01758-REB-MJW DOUGLAS A. GLASER, Plaintiff, v. ROLLIE JORDAN, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on the defendant's Forthwith Motion for Stay of Execution of December 22, 2009 Order Regarding [Pro Se Plaintiff's] Motion To Compel Responses To Interrogatories (Docket No. 68) [#80]1 filed January 7, 2010. I grant the motion. On December 22, 2009, Magistrate Judge Watanabe entered an order [#68] granting the plaintiff's motion to compel responses to interrogatories. The defendant's responses to those interrogatories are due today, January 8, 2010. The defendant filed objections [#76] to the order of the magistrate judge. The defendant's objections are not yet ripe for resolution. To maintain the status quo pending resolution of the defendant's objections, I grant the motion to stay.

"[#80]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

1

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the defendant's Forthwith Motion for Stay of Execution of December 22, 2009 Order Regarding [Pro Se Plaintiff's] Motion To Compel Responses To Interrogatories (Docket No. 68) [#80] filed January 7, 2010, is GRANTED; and 2. That the requirements of the Order Regarding [Pro Se Plaintiff's] Motion To Compel Responses To Interrogatories (Docket No. 68) [#75] filed December 22, 2009, are STAYED pending resolution of the defendant's objections [#76] to the order of the magistrate judge. Dated January 8, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:

2