Shelton v. Courtyard Management Corporation et al

Filing 33

MINUTE ORDER denying as duplicative 27 Plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint; denying without prejudice 29 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Motion to File Third Amended Complaint. Defendant Courtyard Management Corporation shall file a response to 31 Plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint on or before 12/4/09. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 11/24/2009. (mehcd) Modified on 11/25/2009 to add due date for response.(gmssl, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01761-WYD-MEH WILLIAM SHELTON, Plaintiff, v. COURTYARD MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, and COLORADO SNOW SERVICES, LLC, a Division of ENRIGHT COMPANIES, LLC, both Colorado corporations, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on November 24, 2009. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint [filed November 23, 2009; docket #31]. Plaintiff represents that Defendant Courtyard Management Corporation opposes the relief requested. The Court instructs Defendant Courtyard Management Corporation to respond to the pending motion on or before December 4, 2009. Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Motion to File Third Amended Complaint [filed November 23, 2009; docket #29] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A and B. Plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint [filed November 20, 2009; docket #27] is denied as duplicative of the motion filed at docket #18. (See docket #26.)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?