Chicago Insurance Company v. Hamilton et al

Filing 152

ORDER. Ordered that the recommendation of Magistrate Judge 138 is accepted. Plaintiff Chicago Insurance Company's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendant 84 is Granted. The Clerk's Default enter as set forth in this Order by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 06/18/10.(jjh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 09-cv-01815-LTB-MJW CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. JAN B. HAMILTON, Ph.D. and JAN B. HAMILTON d/b/a NUTRITIONAL BIOMEDICINE, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ This case is before me on the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge issued and served on May 26, 2010 (Doc 138). Plaintiff has failed to file specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendation and is therefore barred from de novo review. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the recommendation is accepted as follows: 1. That Plaintiff Chicago Insurance Company's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants (Doc 84) is GRANTED; 2. 3. That a Clerk's Default enter; That default judgment shall enter in favor of Plaintiff Chicago Insurance Company and against Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D., and Jan B. Hamilton d/b/a Nutritional Biomedicine jointly and severally; and 4. The following court declarations are ordered against Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D. and Jan B. Hamilton, d/b/a Nutritional Biomedicine relative to the proceedings brought against Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D., and Jan B. Hamilton, d/b/a Nutritional Biomedicine by the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners: i. There is no insurance coverage available under the Policies relative to the proceedings brought against Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D., and Jan B. Hamilton, d/b/a Nutritional Biomedicine by the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners; ii. The Policies do not provide coverage for any loss of income or earnings incurred by Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D., and Jan B. Hamilton, d/b/a Nutritional Biomedicine. iii. There is no coverage under the Policies for any attorneys' fees or expenses may have incurred in seeking to set aside a court-issued injunction. iv. There is no coverage under the Policies for any attorneys' fees or expenses Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D., and Jan B. Hamilton, d/b/a Nutritional Biomedicine may have incurred relative to proceedings filed with the Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners. v. There is no coverage under the Policies for any attorneys' fees or expenses Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D., and Jan B. Hamilton, d/b/a Nutritional Biomedicine may have incurred because she violated 2 the notice and voluntary payments provisions of the Policies. vi. Any fees or expenses incurred by Defendants Jan B. Hamilton, Ph.D., and Jan B. Hamilton, d/b/a Nutritioal Biomedicinie were incurred without Plaintiff's consent and are precluded from coverage under the Policies. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: June 18, 2010 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?