Chicago Insurance Company v. Hamilton et al

Filing 217

ORDER denying 214 Defendant's Motion for New Trial; denying 215 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying 216 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Any further filings/motions in this matter may be stricken, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/4/2013. (eseam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE Civil Case No. 09-cv-01815-LTB-MJW CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation, Plaintiff, v. JAN B. HAMILTON, Ph.D. and JAN B. HAMILTON d/b/a NUTRITIONAL BIOMEDICINE, Defendants. ________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ________________________________________________________________________ Upon Defendant’s Motion for New Trial (Doc 214), Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (Doc 215), and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc 216), all filed April 2, 2013, the Court notes that this matter was previously dismissed, has been affirmed on appeal, and certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s motions are DENIED. Any further filings/motions in this matter may be stricken. BY THE COURT: s/Lewis T. Babcock Lewis T. Babcock, Judge DATED: April 4, 2013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?