Chicago Insurance Company v. Hamilton et al
Filing
217
ORDER denying 214 Defendant's Motion for New Trial; denying 215 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; denying 216 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Any further filings/motions in this matter may be stricken, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4/4/2013. (eseam)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
LEWIS T. BABCOCK, JUDGE
Civil Case No. 09-cv-01815-LTB-MJW
CHICAGO INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAN B. HAMILTON, Ph.D. and
JAN B. HAMILTON d/b/a NUTRITIONAL BIOMEDICINE,
Defendants.
________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
________________________________________________________________________
Upon Defendant’s Motion for New Trial (Doc 214), Motion for Leave to Proceed in
Forma Pauperis (Doc 215), and Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc 216), all filed April
2, 2013, the Court notes that this matter was previously dismissed, has been affirmed on
appeal, and certiorari denied by the United States Supreme Court. Therefore, it is
ORDERED that Defendant’s motions are DENIED. Any further filings/motions in this
matter may be stricken.
BY THE COURT:
s/Lewis T. Babcock
Lewis T. Babcock, Judge
DATED:
April 4, 2013
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?