Bouchard v. Whetstone et al

Filing 47

ORDER: granting 36 the plaintiffs Motion to Accept Tardy Endorsement of Expert Witness. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any supplement to the Willard opinion must be served on the defendants as soon as possible, but not later than April 1, 2010. IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that Willard shall appear for his deposition at a date and time as the parties may agree, but not later than April 9, 2010. The discovery cut-off is extended to and including April 9, 2010, solely to allow the deposition of Willard to be taken, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/22/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-01884-REB-BNB JAMES B. BOUCHARD, Plaintiff, v. DENVER POLICE OFFICER M. WHETSTONE, DENVER POLICE OFFICER K. JIMENEZ, and CITY OF DENVER, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the plaintiff's Motion to Accept Tardy Endorsement of Expert Witness [Doc. # 36, filed 2/19/2010] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record: IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any supplement to the Willard opinion must be served on the defendants as soon as possible, but not later than April 1, 2010. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Willard shall appear for his deposition at a date and time as the parties may agree, but not later than April 9, 2010. The discovery cut-off is extended to and including April 9, 2010, solely to allow the deposition of Willard to be taken. Dated March 22, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?