Zelenok et al v. Benton et al

Filing 47

ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS re: 46 Plaintiffs' Amended Motion to Dismiss This Action With Prejudice. I dismiss this case with prejudice as to Defendant City of South Fork and without prejudice as to Defendant Benton, all parties to pay their own costs and attorneys' fees, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 6/28/10. (ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO SENIOR JUDGE WALKER D. MILLER Civil Action No. 09-cv-1918-WDM-KMT DAVID A. ZELENOK and KATHLEEN S. ZELENOK Plaintiffs v. DENNY BENTON, individually, and CITY OF SOUTH FORK, COLORADO, an incorporated municipality Defendants. ORDER ON AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS Miller, J. This case comes before me on Plaintiffs' Amended Motion to Dismiss this action with prejudice. (Docket No. 46) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 42(a)(2). Having reviewed the Amended Motion and Responses, I note that all of Plaintiffs' claims have been settled. Neither of the defendants has raised counterclaims. Counsel for Defendant Benton observes that the motion is "not unopposed," yet offers no reason why the motion should be denied. Accordingly, I dismiss this case with prejudice as to Defendant City of South Fork and without prejudice as to Defendant Benton, all parties to pay their own costs and attorneys' fees. DONE at Denver, Colorado, this 28th day of June, 2010. BY THE COURT: ____________________________ Walker D. Miller

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?