Fleming v. Camacho et al

Filing 85

MINUTE ORDER Denying Withouyt Prejudice 82 Plaintiff's Motion to file Third Amended Complaint Under F.R. Civ. Proc. 15(c)(2); It is further ORDERED that the deadline for amendment of pleadings is extended up to and including June 30, 2010; Granting 80 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond re 42 Second Amended Complaint C. L. Polland answer due 7/13/2010; C. (I) L. Polland answer due 7/13/2010, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/15/2010.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-01972-WYD-MJW JOSEPH J. FLEMING, Plaintiff, v. FNU MNU CAMACHO, et al., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe In an Order issued earlier today (Docket No. 84), Chief Judge Daniel dismissed all claims against defendant Curtis and the official capacity claim against defendant Camacho with prejudice. In addition, Chief Judge Daniel found that even if plaintiff's motion for leave to file Third Amended Complaint is granted, that tendered pleading did not change the analysis as plaintiff still had not made viable official capacity constitutional claims against defendants Curtis and Camacho. In view of those findings and dismissals, and upon review of the tendered Third Amended Complaint (Docket No. 77), it is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to File Third Amended Complaint Under F.R. Civ. Proc. 15(c)(2) (Docket No. 82) is denied without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that the deadline for amendment of pleadings is extended up to and including June 30, 2010. It is further ORDERED that Dr. Polland's Motion to Extend the Time to Respond to the Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 80) is granted, and defendant Polland shall thus have up to and including July 13, 2010, to answer or otherwise respond to the Second Amended Complaint. Date: June 15, 2010

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?