Reed v. Vision Financial Corp.

Filing 3

ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE Craig B. Shaffer, by Judge Walker D. Miller on 8/25/09. (Modified to correct typographical error.) (ebs, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior Judge Walker D. Miller Civil Action No. CAITLYNNE REED, Plaintiff, v. VISION FINANCIAL CORP., a New York corporation, Defendant. ___________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE ___________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b), United States Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: (X) (X) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. Convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case. Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other nondispositive motions. Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. 09-cv-01993-WDM-CBS (X) (X) () (X) It is ORDERED, that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) above. The parties are directed to my Pretrial and Trial Procedures available in the Clerk's office or on the court's website: These govern all proceedings in my court and indicate what my expectations are. DATED at Denver, Colorado on August 25, 2009 BY THE COURT: s/ Walker D. Miller United States Senior District Judge PDF FINAL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?