Maynard et al v. Colorado Supreme Court Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, The et al

Filing 109

Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 104 Motion to Intervene, Waiver of FRCP [sic] Rule 24(c), and Motion for Sixty (60) Day Extension by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/1/2010.(kmtcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 09­cv­02052­WYD­KMT ALISON MAYNARD, and GERALD LEWIS, Plaintiffs, v. THE COLORADO SUPREME COURT OFFICE OF ATTORNEY REGULATION COUNSEL, APRIL McMURREY, JOHN GLEASON, JAMES COYLE, COLORADO SUPREME COURT, MARY MULLARKEY, GREGORY J. HOBBS, JR., NANCY RICE, MICHAEL BENDER, NATHAN BEN COATS, ALEX MARTINEZ, and ALLISON EID, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA The "Motion to Intervene, Waiver of FRCP [sic] Rule 24(c), and Motion for Sixty (60) Day Extension" (Doc. No. 104, filed March 17, 2010) is DENIED without prejudice. Ms. Lewis failed to confer with the parties before filing the present motion. The Tenth Circuit has cautioned that pro se litigants "must follow the same rules of procedure that govern other litigants." Green v. Dorrell, 969 F.2d 915, 917 (10th Cir. 1992). The Local Rules of Practice for the District of Colorado require all parties to confer on motions and other disputes before a motion is filed. D.C.Colo.LCivR 7.1A; see also Visor v. Sprint, 1997 WL 796989 (D. Colo. 1997). Dated: April 1, 2010