Ankeney v. Zavaras et al

Filing 37

MINUTE ORDER granting in part 35 Plaintiff's "Judicial Notice of Incorrect Facts" which has been construed as a motion "that the Court allow him leeway in filing deadlines, particulary where he is a pro se party", by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 4/1/2010.(mjwcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02085-CMA-MJW RANDAL ANKENEY, Plaintiff, v. STEVE HARTLEY, et al., Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that the plaintiff's "Judicial Notice of Incorrect Facts" (Docket No. 35), which has been construed as a motion "that the Court allow him leeway in filing deadlines, particularly where he is a pro se party," is granted in part to the extent that the court has considered the plaintiff's response to the defendants' motion to dismiss. (See Docket No. 34 at 3, report and recommendation considered all of the submitted motion papers). Despite plaintiff's pro se status, in the future he is expected to comply with all of the local rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including deadlines contained therein. Therefore, the court will not grant plaintiff carte blanche to have "leeway in filing deadlines." Date: April 1, 2010