Zander v. Craig Hospital et al

Filing 138

ORDER : The final pretrial conference is VACATED, to be reset. The parties may submit supplemental briefs, on or before August 26, 2010, and not exceeding ten pages in length, in connection with Plaintiffs Second Motion to Compel Investigative Documents [Doc. # 125], by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 8/19/10. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-02121-REB-BNB KAREN S. ZANDER, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG HOSPITAL, and RICK BAYLES, PH.D., CNIM, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The parties appeared this morning for a final pretrial conference and argument on a pending motion. On August 16, 2010, the district judge vacated the trial preparation conference and the trial, stating among other things "[t]hat as soon as practicable, the Trial Preparation Conference and trial SHALL BE RESET on the calendar and docket of this court or that of a visiting United States District Judge." Order [Doc. # 135]. In view of those events, I vacated the final pretrial conference, and I will reset it at an appropriate time. During argument, it appeared that there are additional materials that may assist in my determination of Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Investigative Documents. Consequently, I will allow supplemental briefing as the parties may deem appropriate. IT IS ORDERED that the final pretrial conference is VACATED, to be reset. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may submit supplemental briefs, on or before August 26, 2010, and not exceeding ten pages in length, in connection with Plaintiff's Second Motion to Compel Investigative Documents [Doc. # 125]. Dated August 19, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?