Zander v. Craig Hospital et al

Filing 154

ORDER: denying 144 Defendant Craig Hospital and Rick Bayles, Ph.D., CNIMs Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Sixteenth Supplemental Disclosure. granting 147 Defendant Craig Hospitals Motion to Strike Plaintiffs Third Set of Discovery and Motion for Protective Order, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 9/14/10.(bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-02121-REB-BNB KAREN S. ZANDER, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG HOSPITAL, and RICK BAYLES, PH.D., CNIM, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following: (1) Defendant Craig Hospital and Rick Bayles, Ph.D., CNIM's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) Sixteenth Supplemental Disclosure [Doc. # 144, filed 9/1/2010] (the "Motion to Strike"); and (2) Defendant Craig Hospital's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Third Set of Discovery and Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 147, filed 9/1/2010] (the "Motion for Protective Order"). I held a hearing on these motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Motion to Strike [Doc. # 144] is DENIED; and (2) The Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 147] is GRANTED, and the discovery sought by the plaintiff's Request for Production No. 5 in Plaintiff's Third Set of Discovery to Defendant Craig Hospital shall not be had. Dated September 14, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?