Zander v. Craig Hospital et al

Filing 163

ORDER: Granting 157 MOTION for Extension of Time to Reopen Discovery filed by Karen S. Zander, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 11/10/10. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-02121-REB-BNB KAREN S. ZANDER, Plaintiff, v. CRAIG HOSPITAL, and RICK BAYLES, PH.D., CNIM, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on Plaintiff's Motion to Reopen Discovery [Doc. # 157, filed 10/27/2010] (the "Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Motion [Doc. # 157] is GRANTED. The deposition of Dr. Bayles may be reopened for the remaining one hour and seven minutes of examination; the deposition of Dr. Falci may be reopened for not more than two hours of examination; the deposition of Ms. Polonsky may be reopened for any time remaining in the originally allowed seven hours of examination; and defendant Craig Hospital shall produce for inspection and copying, on or before November 19, 2010, "a copy of Dr. Bayles' job description at Craig Hospital," as requested in Request for Production Number 5 of Plaintiff's Third Set of Discovery to Defendant Craig Hospital [Doc. # 151-3]; and (2) The reopened depositions shall be conducted in my jury deliberation suite at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse at a date and time as the parties may agree and when I am available to immediately decide any discovery issues which may arise. D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.3C. Dated November 10, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?