Iselo Holdings, LLC v. Innovative Teleservices Outsourcing Unlimited LLC et al

Filing 82

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe: Motion Hearing held on 5/5/2010. Granting 75 Plaintiffs Motion for Sanctions Based on Defendants Failure to Comply with Court Order, or Alternative Mot ion to Compel Responses to Plaintiffs Combine First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. Defendant Coonan shall have to and including 5/28/2010 to answer the discovery requests. (Court Reporter FTR - Ellen E. Miller) (mjwcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02126-MSK-MJW FTR - Courtroom A-502 Courtroom Deputy, Ellen E. Miller Counsel David A. DeMarco

Date: May 05, 2010 Parties ISELO HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff(s), v. WILLIAM COONAN, Defendant(s).

- - - no appearance - - -

COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTION HEARING Court in session: 9:02 a.m. Court calls case. Appearance of counsel. Defendant William Coonan does not appear nor does any legal representative for him. Default was entered [Docket No. 78] April 21, 2010, by Judge Krieger as to Innovative Teleservices Outsourcing Unlimited LLC d/b/a Automated Research & Marketing and Innovative Teleservices Outsourcing Unlimited LLC d/b/a Automated Research & Marketing and its counterclaim were dismissed. The Court raises Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions for argument. The Court notes and reads into the record Defendants' Response to May 5, 2010 Appearance and Sanctions [Docket No. 81, Filed May 04, 2010]. Argument by Mr. DeMarco. Questions and comments by the Court. It is ORDERED: Plaintiff's MOTION FOR SANCTIONS BASED ON DEFENDANT'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER, OR ALTERNATIVE MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF'S COMBINE FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS [Docket No. 75, Filed March 05, 2010] is GRANTED for reasons as set forth on the record. Defendant Coonan shall have to and including MAY 28, 2010 within which to answer the discovery requests as contained in the plaintiff's motion [Docket No. 75]. Failure of Mr. Coonan to comply with Court orders may result in sanctions which may include recommendation of entry of default.

It is ORDERED:

09-cv-02126-MSK-MJW Motion Hearing May 05, 2010

Discussion is held regarding difficulties plaintiff has encountered in scheduling defendant Coonan' deposition.
HEARING CONCLUDES. Court in recess: 9:23 a.m. Total In-Court Time: 00:21

Page 2 of 2