WildEarth Guardians v. Jackson

Filing 52

ORDER granting 51 Joint Motion to Terminate Consent Decree and To Dismiss. The Amended Consent Decree in this matter is TERMINATED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 6/26/2014.(klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 09-cv-02148-REB-MJW WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiff, v. GINA McCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Joint Motion to Terminate Consent Decree and To Dismiss [#51]1 filed June 24, 2014. The parties report that the United States Environmental Protection Agency has now taken and completed all actions required of it under the Amended Consent Decree and the separate Settlement Agreement resolving this case, and that the Amended Consent Decree may therefore be terminated and the case dismissed. After reviewing the motion and the record, I conclude that the motion should be granted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, this case is REOPENED; 1 “[#51]” is an exam ple of the convention I use to identify the docket num ber assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case m anagem ent and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That the Joint Motion to Terminate Consent Decree and To Dismiss [#51] filed June 24, 2014, is GRANTED; and 3. That the Amended Consent Decree in this matter is TERMINATED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Dated June 26, 2014, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?