Barbetta v. DaVita, Inc. et al
Filing
79
ORDER granting 78 Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims. The Non-Settling Plaintiff States are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall pay its own attorney's fees and costs. By Judge William J. Martinez on 1/15/2015. (alowe)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Case No. 09-cv-2175-WJM-KMT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the States of
CALIFORNIA,
COLORADO,
CONNECTICUT,
FLORIDA,
GEORGIA,
ILLINOIS,
INDIANA,
IOWA,
LOUISIANA,
MARYLAND,
MICHIGAN,
NEVADA,
NEW YORK,
NORTH CAROLINA,
OKLAHOMA,
TENNESSEE,
TEXAS,
VIRGINIA,
WISCONSIN, and
DAVID BARBETTA, ex rel.
Plaintiffs,
v.
DAVITA, INC., and
TOTAL RENAL CARE, INC.,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN CLAIMS
This matter comes before the Court on the unopposed named Plaintiff states of
Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, Nevada,
new York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin
(“Non-Settling Plaintiff States”) Motion to Dismiss, filed January 13, 2015 (ECF No. 78).
The Court having reviewed the Motion and being fully advised hereby ORDERS as
follows:
The Non-Settling Plaintiff States’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The NonSettling Plaintiff States are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Each party shall
pay its own attorney’s fees and costs.
Dated this 15th day of January, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
_______________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?