Acks et al v. City and County of Denver et al

Filing 51

ORDER Granting 48 Unopposed Motion to Amend 27 Scheduling Order to Extend Discovery Cutoff and Dispositive Motion Deadlines. Discovery due by 8/23/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 10/10/2010. Signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/16/2010.(rpmcd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02197-RPM (Consolidated with 10-cv-00629-RPM) NATHAN ACKS; TIFFANY BRAY; CHASE GOLL; ELI HARDY; AMINAH MASUD; IAN MORRISON; BLAKE PENDERGRASS; KIM SIDWELL; and JACOB STERNBERG Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER; DEBORAH DILLEY, a Commander with the Denver Police Department, in individual capacity; JOHN DOE, whose true name is currently unknown, in his individual capacity; ANTHONY FOSTER, a Sergeant with the Denver Police Department, in individual capacity; ANTHONY MARTINEZ, a Sergeant with the Denver Police Department, in individual capacity; and WILLIAM LOVINGIER, Undersheriff with the Denver Police Department, in individual capacity; her his his his Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER TO EXTEND DISCOVERY CUTOFF AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION DEADLINES ______________________________________________________________________ Upon consideration of the Unopposed Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Extend Discovery Cutoff and Dispositive Motion Deadlines [48], it is ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: a. Paragraph 7(b) of the Scheduling Order will be amended to provide that the new discovery cutoff will be August 23, 2010; b. Paragraph 7(c) of the Scheduling Order will be amended to provide for a dispositive motion deadline of October 10, 2010. DATED: June 16th, 2010 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?