Jaramillo v. Adams County School District 14 Board of Education et al

Filing 37

ORDER Granting 36 Unopposed Motion to Amend the 18 Scheduling Order. Defendant shall have up to and including June 30, 2010 for the disclosure of contradictory expert witnesses under Section 7(d)(4) of the Scheduling Order and that the parties shall have up to and including July 15, 2010 to disclose rebuttal expert opinions under Section 7(d)(5) of the Scheduling Order, signed by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 6/16/2010.(rpmcd )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02243-RPM JUDY JARAMILLO, Plaintiff, vs. ADAMS COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT 14, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER Upon consideration of Defendant Adams County School District 14's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order as it applies to contradictory expert deadlines [36], it is. ORDERED that Defendant Adams County School District 14's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order is hereby GRANTED, that this Defendant shall have up to and including June 30, 2010 for the disclosure of contradictory expert witnesses under Section 7(d)(4) of the Scheduling Order and that the parties shall have up to and including July 15, 2010 to disclose rebuttal expert opinions under Section 7(d)(5) of the Scheduling Order. SO ORDERED this 16th day of June, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ____________________________________ Richard P. Matsch United States District Court Judge

TRAV/1062676/7966684v.1