Salazar v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan For Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 2/5/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 3/3/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/18/2010. By Judge John L. Kane on 12/22/2009. (sah, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02292-AP RUDY SALAZAR, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Kenneth J. Shakeshaft Attorney for Plaintiff 1530 S. Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO 80905 719-635-5886 firstname.lastname@example.org For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Telephone: (303) 454-0184 email@example.com DEBRA J. MEACHUM Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Debra.firstname.lastname@example.org Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, CO 80294 Telephone: (303) 844-1570
STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. C. Date Complaint Was Filed: September 10, 2009. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: October 8, 2009. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: December 7, 2009.
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD Plaintiff states: To the best of his knowledge, the record is complete. Defendant states: To the best of his knowledge, the record is complete.
STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Plaintiff states: None anticipated. Defendant states: None anticipated.
STATEMENT REGARDING UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.
OTHER MATTERS None.
BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. B. C. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: February 5, 2010. Defendant's Response Brief Due: March 3, 2010. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: March 18, 2010.
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 22nd day of December, 2009. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane ____ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: s/Kenneth J. Shakeshaft Kenneth J. Shakeshaft 1530 S. Tejon Street Colorado Springs, CO 80905 719-635-5886 email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov By: s/Debra J. Meachum DEBRA J. MEACHUM Special Assistant U. S. Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, CO 80294 Telephone: (303) 844-1570 Debra.firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Defendant.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?