Kruse v. US Bank NA et al

Filing 79

ORDER : Revised Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/15/2011. Supplemental Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/21/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 401 before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland. Exhibits must be provided to opposing counsel no later than March 28, 2011, and the objections contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) shall be filed and served no later than April 11, 2011, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/21/11. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-02302-LTB-BNB THOMAS G. KRUSE, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, and MARGARET A. CHAPMAN, as Public Trustee of Jefferson County, Colorado, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ The parties appeared this afternoon for a final pretrial conference. The proposed final pretrial order was refused for the reasons stated on the record. IT IS ORDERED: (1) (2) The proposed final pretrial order is REFUSED; Each page of every exhibit must be Bates numbered, and the Bates numbers of the beginning and ending pages of each exhibit shall be reported on the exhibit list; (3) Copies of listed exhibits must be provided to opposing counsel no later than March 28, 2011, and the objections contemplated by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) shall be filed and served no later than April 11, 2011; (4) The parties shall prepare a revised proposed final pretrial order, modified as discussed this afternoon, and submit it to the court no later than April 15, 2011; and (5) A supplemental final pretrial conference is set for April 21, 2011, at 8:30 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Dated March 21, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?