Waring v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/17/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/16/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 5/3/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 1/25/10. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02370-AP Raymond A. Waring Plaintiff, v. Michael Astrue Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: PATRICK C.H. SPENCER, II Spencer & Spencer, P.C. 830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320 Colorado Springs, CO 80906 719-632-4808 email@example.com For Defendant: THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 454-0100 firstname.lastname@example.org
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION This is a Social Security appeal. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: October 5, 2009 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: October 9, 2009 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: December 14, 2009 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence at this time. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. B. C. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due: March 17, 2010 Defendant's Response Brief Due: April 16, 2010 Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due: May 3, 2010
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
The parties do not request oral argument. 10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A.
9 All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United
States Magistrate Judge.
: All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a
United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED: January 25, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane ______ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: /s Patrick C.H. Spencer, II Patrick C.H. Spencer, II Spencer & Spencer, P.C. 830 Tenderfoot Hill Road, Suite 320 Colorado Springs, CO 80906 719-632-4808 email@example.com Attorney for Plaintiff DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado firstname.lastname@example.org /s Thomas H. Kraus Thomas H. Kraus Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1225 Seventeenth Street, Suite 700 Denver, Colorado 80202 (303) 454-0100 email@example.com Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?