Gray v. Nextel West Corp.

Filing 22

MINUTE ORDER denying as duplicative 15 Stipulated Motion for Entry of Protective Order; denying without prejudice 17 Stipulated Motion for Entry of Protective Order, and the proposed Stipulated Protective Order is refused, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/15/2009.(wjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02390-MSK-MEH AKILI GRAY, Plaintiff, v. NEXTEL WEST GROUP, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 15, 2009. The Stipulated Motion for Entry of Protective Order [filed December 10, 2009; docket #17] is denied without prejudice, and the proposed Stipulated Protective Order is refused. The parties are granted leave to submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), in which the Court requires that the party seeking protection shoulders the burden of proof in justifying retaining a confidentiality designation when challenged by the opposing party. See id. at 386-87. The Stipulated Motion for Entry of Protective Order [filed December 3, 2009; docket #15] is denied as duplicative.