Nagim v. Equifax Information Services, LLC et al

Filing 120

ORDER. Defendant Trans Union, LLC's 114 Motion for Costs is granted. The Clerk of the Court shall review defendant Trans Union, LLC's proposed bill of costs, see Docket No. 113 ; see also Docket No. 114 -1, and tax costs against plaintiff as appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/11/11.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Philip A. Brimmer Civil Case No. 09-cv-02428-PAB-KLM RONALD J. NAGIM, Plaintiff, v. EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., and TRANS UNION, LLC, Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court on defendant Trans Union, LLC’s motion for costs [Docket No. 114] pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1). Plaintiff has filed no response to the motion, and the Court identifies no reason to depart from the “presumption that the district court will award costs to the prevailing party.” Cantrell v. Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 69 F.3d 456, 459 (10th Cir. 1995) (en banc). Therefore, it is ORDERED that defendant Trans Union, LLC’s motion for costs [Docket No. 114] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall review defendant Trans Union, LLC’s proposed bill of costs, see Docket No. 113; see also Docket No. 114-1, and tax costs against plaintiff as appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920. DATED October 11, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/Philip A. Brimmer PHILIP A. BRIMMER United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?