Sandoval v. Martinez-Barnish et al

Filing 149

Minute Entry for Motions Hearing held before Judge William J. Martinez: ORDERED:The Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order denying the stay of these proceedings 129 is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. A written order will issue. A new discovery cutoff date and a new dispositive motion deadline, which comport with the Court's ruling on the objection, will be set forth in the written order. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order 130 is GRANTED. The proceedings are stayed until this Court rules on Defendant's Rule 72 objection at issue in this hearing. (Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel) (wjmcd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez _____________________________________________________________________ Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Hansen Date: March 28, 2011 Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel _____________________________________________________________________ Civil Case No. 09-cv-02434-WJM-MJW CINDY H. SANDOVAL, Plaintiff, v. ANNA MARTINEZ-BARNISH, Defendant, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Juan G. Villasenor Evan S. Lipstein Counsel: Elwyn F. Schaefer Sara A. Green

Interested Party. _____________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES _____________________________________________________________________ Motions Hearing 09:37 a.m. Appearances Court's comments All counsel confirm that there are no suggestions of recusal with regard to the Notice of Disclosure entered by the Court on February 24, 2011 (Doc No. 145). The Court addresses the two pending motions: 1) Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc No. 129); and 2) Defendant's Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc No. 130). Court in Session

1

09:41 Argument by Mr. Lipstein 10:00 Argument by Ms. Green 10:10 Argument by Mr. Villasenor 10:16 Argument by Mr. Lipstein ORDERED: The Defendant's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order denying the stay of these proceedings (Doc No. 129) is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. A written order will issue. A new discovery cutoff date and a new dispositive motion deadline, which comport with the Court's ruling on the objection, will be set forth in the written order. ORDERED: Defendant's Motion for Stay of Proceedings Pending Resolution of Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc No. 130) is GRANTED. The proceedings are stayed until this Court rules on Defendant's Rule 72 objection at issue in this hearing. 10:20 a.m. Court in Recess Hearing concluded Time: /49

2