McArthur v. Davis

Filing 25

ORDER. The the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 22 filed 10/29/2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court. The Application For a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C.§ 2241 1 filed 10/26/2009, is DENIED. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 12/21/2010.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 09-cv-02506-REB-BNB RANDY KAY McARTHUR, Applicant, v. B. DAVIS, Warden, Respondent. ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Blackburn, J. The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#22]1 filed October 29, 2010. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).2 Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#22] filed October 29, 2010, is APPROVED AND ADOPTED as an order of this court; and
1

"[#22]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. MoralesFernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.
2

2. That the Application For a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [#1] filed October 26, 2009, is DENIED. Dated December 21, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT:

2