Smith v. Gaiam, Inc.
Filing
83
Minute Entry for In Court hearing proceedings held on 4/5/2011 before Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel. Granting 74 Motion for Attorney Fees. Granting 75 Motion for Attorney Fees. Granting 81 Motion for Order. (Court Reporter: Therese Lindblom) (wydcd, rrk)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL
Courtroom Deputy: E.C.R./Reporter:
Robert R. Keech Therese Lindblom
Date: April 5, 2011
Civil Action No: 09-cv-02545-WYD-BNB DANIEL SMITH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GAIAM, INC., Defendant.
Counsel: Benjamin F. Johns Charles W. Lilly Joseph G. Sauder Edward M. Gergosian
Richard B. Benenson Kathryn R. Rothman
COURTROOM MINUTES
IN COURT HEARING 9:15 a.m. Court in Session APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Court's opening remarks. Joint Motion for Final Approval of the Parties' Class Action Settlement (doc. #81), filed March 30, 2011, Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Fees and Expenses, and Incentive Awards to the Named Plaintiffs (doc. #74), filed February 15, 2011, and Plaintiffs' Supplemental Certification to Unopposed Motion for Fees and Expenses, and Incentive Awards to the Named Plaintiffs (doc. #75), filed February 15, 2011, are raised for argument. 9:17 a.m. 9:21 a.m. Argument by Plaintiffs (Mr. Sauder). Argument by Defendant (Mr. Benenson).
-1-
9:22 a.m. 9:31 a.m.
Argument by Plaintiffs (Mr. Sauder). Argument by Defendant (Mr. Benenson). Court makes findings.
ORDERED:
Joint Motion for Final Approval of the Parties' Class Action Settlement (doc. #81), filed March 30, 2011, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Fees and Expenses, and Incentive Awards to the Named Plaintiffs (doc. #74), filed February 15, 2011, is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Supplemental Certification to Unopposed Motion for Fees and Expenses, and Incentive Awards to the Named Plaintiffs (doc. #75), filed February 15, 2011, is GRANTED. Court in Recess - HEARING CONCLUDED
ORDERED:
ORDERED:
9:38 a.m.
TOTAL TIME: :23
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?