Lopez v. Astrue
Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 3/15/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 4/14/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 4/29/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 2/2/10. (gmssl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02564-AP LEO ESPIRIDION LOPEZ, JR.., v. Plaintiff,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES ______________________________________________________________________________ 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: Gregory J. Styduhar Koncilja & Koncilja, P.C. Pueblo, CO 81003 719.543.9591 719.543.0247 (fax) firstname.lastname@example.org For Defendant: Sandra T. Krider Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001-A Denver, CO 80294 303.844.0015 303.844.0770 (fax) email@example.com 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
This is a Social Security appeal. The Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. B. C. Date Complaint Was Filed: October 30, 2009 Date Complaint was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: November 3, 2009 Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: January 11, 2010
STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
It appears the Administrative Record is complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The Plaintiff has not submitted nor does he intend to submit any additional evidence at this time. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
This case does not provide any unusual claims or defenses. 7. OTHER MATTERS
The Plaintiff has no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. B. C. 9. Plaintiff's Opening Brief: March 15, 2010 Response Brief due: April 14, 2010 Reply Brief due: April 29, 2010
STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. B. Plaintiff's Statement: The Plaintiff does not request oral argument. Defendant's Statement: The Defendant does not request oral argument.
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
(X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED: February 2, 2010 BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane __________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED: /s Gregory J. Studuhar Gregory J. Styduhar Koncilja & Koncilja, P.C. Pueblo, CO 81003 719.543.9591 719.543.0247 (fax) firstname.lastname@example.org Attorney for Plaintiff
DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado Kevin.Traskos@usdoj.gov /s Sandra T. Krider Sandra T. Krider Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001-A Denver, CO 80294 303.844.0015 303.844.0770 (fax) email@example.com Attorneys for Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?