e.Digital Corporation v. Pentax of America, Inc. et al

Filing 3

ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 16: Rule 16 Hearing set for 1/7/2010 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/4/09. (msksec, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Honorable Marcia S. Krieger Civil Action No. 09-cv-02578-MSK-MJW e.DIGITAL CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. PENTAX OF AMERICA, INC.; HOYA CORPORATION; HOYA CORPORATION USA; CANON USA, INC.; CANON, INC.; COBY ELECTRONICS CORP.; DXG TECHNOLOGY (U.S.A.), INC.; HTC AMERICA, INC.; HTC CORPORATION; IKEGAMI ELECTRONICS (USA), INC.; IMATION CORPORATION; KYOCERA COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; KYOCERA WIRELESS, INC.; KYOCERA INTERNAITONAL, INC.; KYOCERA CORPORATION; LEICA CAMERA, INC.; LEICA CAMERA AG; MARANTZ AMERICA, INC.; D&M HOLDINGS U.S. INC.; D&m HOLDINGS, INC.; NOKIA, INC.; NOKIA CORPORATION; PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA; PANASONIC CORPORATION; SUMMIT GLOBAL GROUP, LLC; ROLAND SYSTEMS GROUP U.S.; ROLAND CORPORATION; SAKAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.; SAMSON TECHNOLOGIES CORP.; TEAC AMERICA, INC.; VTECH ELECTRNOICS NORTH AMERICA, LLC; and TIC COMPUTER, INC., Defendants. ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 16 THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a Complaint filed by the Plaintiff alleging the infringement of a patent. In light thereof, a hearing pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.1 is necessary. This is not a scheduling conference; do not submit a proposed scheduling order. IT IS ORDERED: (1) A hearing is set for January 7, 2010, at 4:00 p.m., in Courtroom A901 of the United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Counsel shall bring their calendars. Prior to the hearing, the parties shall meet and confer about the following issues and be prepared to address them at the hearing: · · · · · Whether there are issues of claim construction. Whether a hearing will be required under Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (1996). If a hearing is required, whether discovery is necessary prior to the hearing. If so, what discovery is required. (This hearing does not substitute for a scheduling conference before the Magistrate Judge.) Whether there are any other issues or impediments to the setting of a Markman hearing. Other appropriate issues enumerated in Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(c). (2) DATED this 4th day of November, 2009. BY THE COURT: Marcia S. Krieger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?