Graffis v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Filing 59

Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Hearing on Motion and Further Trial Preparation Conference held before Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The Motion to Exclude William Bogett 42 is DENIED. (Court Reporter: Tracy Weir) (lbush) Modified on 4/1/2011 to indicate the correct ruling of the motion (sah, ).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK _____________________________________________________________________ Courtroom Deputy: LaDonne Bush Court Reporter: Tracy Weir Date: April 1, 2011 _____________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 09-cv-02581-LTB-KLM THOMAS J. GRAFFIS, JR., Plaintiff, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Motion and Further Trial Preparation Conference 9:02 a.m. Court in session. Thomas Hayden Torry Garland Counsel: Fredric Bremseth Court's comments regarding the Motion to Exclude William Bogett [42]. Court takes judicial notice of a transcript of a hearing before Judge Brimmer in Smith v. Union Pacific, 07-cv-00549-TJM-CBS, addressing Mr. Bogett's testimony in that case and the motion to exclude it. Argument by Messrs. Hayden and Bremseth regarding the Motion. Court's ruling. ORDERED: Motion to Exclude William Bogett [42] is denied. 1 9:53 a.m. 10:05 a.m. Court in recess. Court in session. Court's comments regarding the continuing resolution and the possibility of a government shutdown. Court's comments regarding jury instructions, clarification of exhibit lists, witness lists, voir dire questions, Plaintiff's trial brief, and depositions. 10:16 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Time: 01:02 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?