Marquez v. Rio Grande County, Colorado et al

Filing 39

MINUTE ORDER: Defendants Peterson and Metz's Motion to Dismiss 15 is DENIED as moot, by Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 2/3/10. (pabsec)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02584-PAB-MJW CHRISTINA MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN NORTON, Sheriff of Rio Grande County, Colorado, BOYD WHEELWRIGHT, Deputy Sheriff of Rio Grande County, Colorado, HARVEST STANDARD, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, d/b/a/ Harvest Select, MICHELE PETERSON, and JENNIFER METZ, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Judge Philip A. Brimmer This matter is before the Court on defendants Michele Peterson and Jennifer Metz's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Seventh Claim for Relief [Docket No. 15]. On January 19, 2010, plaintiff filed the Second Amended Complaint [Docket No. 28] pursuant to the Minute Order [Docket No. 27] granting Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [Docket No. 23]. Thus, the Second Amended Complaint became the operative pleading in this action, and the Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 15] is directed to an inoperative, superseded pleading. See, e.g., Gilles v. United States, 906 F.2d 1386, 1389 (10th Cir. 1990) ("a pleading that has been amended under Rule 15(a) supersedes the pleading it modifies") (internal quotation marks omitted). As such, the motion to dismiss is moot. It is ORDERED that defendants Peterson and Metz's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 15] is DENIED as moot. DATED February 3, 2010.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?