Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mantria Corporation et al
Filing
236
ORDER granting 234 Unopposed Motion to Partially Lift Stay for Receivership Claims Against Astor Weiss Kaplan & Mandel, LLP, Tatum, LLC, a division of SFN Group, Inc., Christopher P. Flannery, Daniel J. Rink, Krassenstein & Unger, LLC, and Steven L . Granoff. The Stay is lifted for the limited purpose of the Receiver pursuing his Complaint against the Gatekeepers, as attached to the Motion. The Stay remains in full force and effect as to any other claims or third parties. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/17/11.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02676-CMA-MJW
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
MANTRIA CORPORATION,
TROY B. WRAGG,
AMANDA E. KNORR,
SPEED OF WEALTH, LLC,
WAYDE M. MCKELVY, and
DONNA M. MCKELVY,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PARTIALLY LIFT STAY FOR
RECEIVERSHIP CLAIMS AGAINST ASTOR WEISS KAPLAN & MANDEL, LLP,
TATUM, LLC, A DIVISION OF SFN GROUP, INC., CHRISTOPHER P. FLANNERY,
DANIEL J. RINK, KRASSENSTEIN & UNGER, LLC, AND STEVEN L. GRANOFF
This matter is before the Court on Receiver John Paul Anderson’s Unopposed
Motion to Partially Lift Stay for Receivership Claims Against Astor Weiss Kaplan &
Mandel, LLP, Tatum, LLC, a division of SFN Group, Inc., Christopher P. Flannery,
Daniel J. Rink, Krassenstein & Unger, LLC, and Steven L. Granoff (collectively, the
“Gatekeepers”). (Doc. # 234.) The Court being fully advised in the premises, it is
hereby
ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Stay is lifted for the limited
purpose of the Receiver pursuing his Complaint against the Gatekeepers, as attached
to the Motion. The Stay remains in full force and effect as to any other claims or third
parties.
DATED: November
17
, 2011
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?