Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mantria Corporation et al

Filing 236

ORDER granting 234 Unopposed Motion to Partially Lift Stay for Receivership Claims Against Astor Weiss Kaplan & Mandel, LLP, Tatum, LLC, a division of SFN Group, Inc., Christopher P. Flannery, Daniel J. Rink, Krassenstein & Unger, LLC, and Steven L . Granoff. The Stay is lifted for the limited purpose of the Receiver pursuing his Complaint against the Gatekeepers, as attached to the Motion. The Stay remains in full force and effect as to any other claims or third parties. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/17/11.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 09-cv-02676-CMA-MJW SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. MANTRIA CORPORATION, TROY B. WRAGG, AMANDA E. KNORR, SPEED OF WEALTH, LLC, WAYDE M. MCKELVY, and DONNA M. MCKELVY, Defendants. ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO PARTIALLY LIFT STAY FOR RECEIVERSHIP CLAIMS AGAINST ASTOR WEISS KAPLAN & MANDEL, LLP, TATUM, LLC, A DIVISION OF SFN GROUP, INC., CHRISTOPHER P. FLANNERY, DANIEL J. RINK, KRASSENSTEIN & UNGER, LLC, AND STEVEN L. GRANOFF This matter is before the Court on Receiver John Paul Anderson’s Unopposed Motion to Partially Lift Stay for Receivership Claims Against Astor Weiss Kaplan & Mandel, LLP, Tatum, LLC, a division of SFN Group, Inc., Christopher P. Flannery, Daniel J. Rink, Krassenstein & Unger, LLC, and Steven L. Granoff (collectively, the “Gatekeepers”). (Doc. # 234.) The Court being fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Stay is lifted for the limited purpose of the Receiver pursuing his Complaint against the Gatekeepers, as attached to the Motion. The Stay remains in full force and effect as to any other claims or third parties. DATED: November 17 , 2011 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?