Chanel, Inc. v. EU Interstate, LLC

Filing 36

Minute Entry - Courtroom Minutes for Motion Hearing held on 4/8/2010 before Judge Richard P. Matsch. ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment Against Defendant EU Interstate, LLC, filed February 24, 2010 27 , is granted. Counsel shall submit revised language identifying registrar/registry and the mandate about canceling or placing on hold the names as instructed by April 9, 2010.(Court Reporter Gwen Daniel) (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Walker D. Miller Date: April 8, 2010 Courtroom Deputy: J. Chris Smith Court Reporter: Gwen Daniel ______________________________________________________________________________ Civil Action No. 09-cv-02701-WDM-MEH CHANEL, INC., a New York Corporation, Plaintiff, v. EU INTERSTATE , LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company and DOES 1-10, No appearance Peter A. Gergely Stephen M. Gaffigan Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ COURTROOM MINUTES ______________________________________________________________________________ Hearing on Motion for Default Judgment 9:08 a.m. Court in session. Court's preliminary remarks and entry of appearances by counsel. Mr. Gaffigan states Clerk's Entry of Default has entered [25]. Court's statements regarding the requirements of entry of default judgments. Mr. Gaffigan answers questions asked by the Court regarding domain names (Website addresses / registrations) and the submitted proposed order (relief sought / terminology). ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment Against Defendant EU Interstate, LLC, filed February 24, 2010 [27], is granted. Counsel shall submit revised language identifying registrar/registry and the mandate about canceling or placing on hold the names as instructed by April 9, 2010. 9:33 a.m. Court in recess. Hearing concluded. Total time: 25 min.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?