Davis v. Arundel et al

Filing 26

ORDER. Plaintiffs Notice of Dismissal of Individual Defendants Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 23 filed 03/31/2010, is APPROVED. Plaintiffs claims against defendants, James Arundel and Alan Rupe, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendants, James Arundel and Alan Rupe, are DROPPED as named parties to this litigation, and the case caption is amended accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 04/01/2010. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 09-cv-02768-REB-MJW HEATHER DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. KUTAK ROCK, LLP, JAMES ARUNDEL, and ALAN RUPE, Defendants. ORDER DISMISSING DEFENDANTS JAMES ARUNDEL AND ALAN RUPE, ONLY Blackburn, J. The matter before me is Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal of Individual Defendants Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 [#23] filed March 31, 2010. After careful review of the notice and the file, I conclude that the notice should be approved and that plaintiff's claims against defendants, James Arundel and Alan Rupe, should be dismissed without prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That Plaintiff's Notice of Dismissal of Individual Defendants Pursuant To Fed.R.Civ.P. 41 [#23] filed March 31, 2010, is APPROVED; 2. That plaintiff's claims against defendants, James Arundel and Alan Rupe, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 3. That defendants, James Arundel and Alan Rupe, are DROPPED as named parties to this litigation, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated April 1, 2010, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?