Davis v. Arundel et al

Filing 9

ORDER OF RECUSAL AND ORDER ON MOTION: I hereby recuse myself from service in this matter. I direct the Clerk of the Court to cause this matter to be reassigned by random draw to another Magistrate Judge; 7 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 2/19/2010 is vacated. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/16/2010. (mehcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02768-WYD-MEH HEATHER DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. KUTAK ROCK, LLP, a Nebraska limited liability partnership, JAMES ARUNDEL, and ALAN RUPE, Defendants. ORDER OF RECUSAL Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §455(b)(5), a Magistrate Judge shall disqualify himself under the following circumstances: He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the spouse of such a person: ... (ii) Is acting as a lawyer in the proceeding; . . . My law clerk, who works closely with me on all cases assigned to this chambers, is the spouse of Todd J. McNamara of McNamara, Roseman, Martinez & Kazmierski LLP, who will be serving as Plaintiff's co-counsel in this matter. See docket #7. In the interests of avoiding any appearance of impropriety (see 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)), I hereby recuse myself from service in this matter. I direct the Clerk of the Court to cause this matter to be reassigned by random draw to another Magistrate Judge. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate the Scheduling Conference [filed February 12, 2010; docket #7] is granted and the Scheduling Conference set for Friday, February 19, 2010 is vacated. The conference will be rescheduled by the Magistrate Judge drawn to this matter. DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 16th day of February, 2010. BY THE COURT: Michael E. Hegarty United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?