Walker v. State of Colorado, The et al

Filing 9

Minute ORDER The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that Plaintiff filed on 11/30/09, is denied as unnecessary because on 11/25/09, Plaintiff filed a similar motion on the proper, Court-approved form. The November 25 motion remains pending before the Court. The motions that Plaintiff filed on 12/03/09, for Court-appointed counsel and for copies of the complaint to be made by the Court and served on Defendants are denied as premature. The motion for excusable neglect that Plaintiff filed on 12/18/09, is denied as unnecessary by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 12/21/09.(jjh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02828-BNB JASON E. WALKER, Plaintiff, v. THE STATE OF COLORADO, THE CITY OF COLORADO SPRINGS, THE EL PASO COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT., THE COUNTY OF EL PASO (COLORADO), SHERIFF TERRY MAKETA, LEUITENANT [sic] BRANDT, EX-COMMANDER HILT, DEPUTY MOTT, DEPUTY HORTON, and LEUITENANT [sic] ZANI, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND This matter is before the Court on five pending motions filed by Plaintiff, Jason E. Walker. This minute order disposes of four of the motions. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis that Plaintiff filed on November 30, 2009, is denied as unnecessary because on November 25, 2009, Plaintiff filed a similar motion on the proper, Court-approved form. The November 25 motion remains pending before the Court. The motions that Plaintiff filed on December 3, 2009, for Court-appointed counsel and for copies of the complaint to be made by the Court and served on Defendants are denied as premature. The motion for excusable neglect that Plaintiff filed on December 18, 2009, is denied as unnecessary. Dated: December 21, 2009

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?