McCargo v. Texas Roadhouse, Inc.

Filing 104

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 102 Motion for Entry of Protective Order. The proposed Protective Order is REFUSED, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 09/28/2010.(wjc, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya Civil Action No. 09­cv­02889­WYD­KMT ANDREW L. McCARGO, Plaintiff, v. TEXAS ROADHOUSE, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA The "Motion for Entry of Protective Order" (Doc. No. 102, filed September 28, 2010) is DENIED without prejudice. The proposed Protective Order is REFUSED. Gillard v. Boulder Valley School District, 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), set out certain requirements for the issuance of a blanket protective order such as the one sought here. Among other things, any information designated by a party as confidential must first be reviewed by a lawyer who will certify that the designation as confidential is "based on a good faith belief that [the information] is confidential or otherwise entitled to protection" under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c)(7). Gillard, 196 F.R.D. at 386. The proposed Protective Order does not comply with the requirements established in Gillard. Dated: September 28, 2010