Hughes v. United Resource Systems, Inc
ORDER OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe is designated to convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 04/22/2010. (wjc, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-02935-BNB-MJW ROBERT HUGHES, Plaintiff, v. UNITED RESOURCE SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ______________________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P.72(a) and (b), United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: () () Convene a Scheduling Conference under Fed.R.Civ.P.16(b) and enter a Scheduling Order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LR.29.1; Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the Scheduling Order, including amendments or modifications of the Scheduling Order upon a showing of good cause; Convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case. Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order.
(X) () () ()
IT IS ORDERED that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) above. DATED April 22, 2010.
BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?