Camp v. Astrue

Filing 11

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 5/3/2010. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/2/2010. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/17/2010, by Judge John L. Kane on 04/16/2010. (sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02971-AP CAROLYN H. CAMP, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: TERESA H. ABBOTT Law Office of Teresa Abbott, P.C. 3515 South Tamarac Drive, Suite 200 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] For Defendant: DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant United States Attorney 1961 Stout Street, Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 [phone] [e-mail]

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. � 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 12/21/2009 B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorneys Office: 01/26/10 C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 03/31/2010 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD Plaintiff states: That the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate. Defendant states: That the Administrative Record appears to be complete and accurate. 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE Plaintiff states: None anticipated. Defendant states: None anticipated. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES There are no unusual claims or defenses in this case. 7. OTHER MATTERS There are no other matters. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: 05/03/2010 B. Defendants Response Brief Due: 06/02/2010 C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 06/17/2010 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument. B. Defendants Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument

10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (X) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. OTHER MATTERS The parties filing motions for extension of time or continuances must comply with D.C.Colo.LCivR. 7.1(c) by submitting proof that a copy of the motion has been served upon the moving attorneys client, all attorneys of record, and all pro se parties. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 16th day of April, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane _____ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

APPROVED: For Plaintiff: s/ Teresa H. Abbott TERESA H. ABBOTT Law Office of Teresa Abbott, P.C. 3515 South Tamarac Drive, Suite 200 Telephone [phone] Facsimile [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorney for Plaintiff

For Defendant: UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DAVID M. GAOUETTE United States Attorney KEVIN TRASKOS Deputy Chief, Civil Division United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado s/ Thomas H. Kraus THOMAS H. KRAUS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 1961 Stout St., Suite 1001A Denver, Colorado 80294 Telephone: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant