WildEarth Guardians v. Lamar Utilities Board et al

Filing 155

ORDER. The Court, on its own motion, directs the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether, and to what extent, this case is moot. The supplemental briefs may not be more than five pages in length, and should be filed simultaneously ten days from the date of this order, by Judge David M. Ebel on 9/5/12. (lygsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 1:09-cv-02974-DME-BNB WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. LAMAR UTILITIES BOARD doing business as LAMAR LIGHT AND POWER, and ARKANSAS RIVER POWER AUTHORITY, Defendants. ORDER The Court, on its own motion, directs the parties to file supplemental briefs addressing whether, and to what extent, this case is moot, in light of the revised construction permit the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s Air Pollution Control Division issued Defendants, on July 25, 2012, and in light of the recent Tenth Circuit decision in Wildearth Guardians v. Public Service Co. of Colorado, No. 111400, 2012 WL 3243458 (10th Cir. Aug. 10, 2012). The supplemental briefs may not be more than five pages in length, and should be filed simultaneously ten days from the date of this order. Dated this 5th day of September , 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ David M. Ebel U. S. CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?