Doll et al v. Kaz USA, Inc. et al

Filing 181

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Final Pretrial Conference held on 6/14/2011. A Supplemental Final Pretrial Conference will be set at a later date. taking under advisement 159 Motion to strike the letters p roduced with plaintiffs sixteenth and nineteenth supplemental Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures. taking under advisement 164 Defendants motion to take the depositions of Shannon Doll and Tara Smith. taking under advisement 167 Defendants motion to strike plaintiff Shirley Doll Kochs supplemental answer to defendants first set of interrogatories. (FTR: G.Mattei) (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO U.S. MAGISTRATE BOYD N. BOLAND Civil Action No. 09-cv-02976-LTB-BNB Courtroom Deputy: Geneva D. Mattei Date: June 14, 2011 FTR BNB COURTROOM A 401 SHIRLEY DOLL, and JIMMIE KOCH, W. Randolph Barnhart Stephen Kaufman Plaintiff(s), v. KAZ USA, INC., and KAZ, INC. Mark Harris Rusty Miller Laura Hass Defendant(s). COURTROOM MINUTES FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE and MOTIONS HEARING Court in Session: 8:31 a.m. Appearance of counsel. Court’s initial comments. Argument presented. ORDERED: Motion to strike the letters produced with plaintiffs’ sixteenth and nineteenth supplemental Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures [doc.#159; filed 5/23/11] is taken under advisement. ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to take the depositions of Shannon Doll and Tara Smith [doc. #164; filed 5/26/11] is taken under advisement. ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff Shirley Doll Koch’s supplemental answer to defendants’ first set of interrogatories [doc. #167; filed 6/2/11] is taken under advisement. ORDERED: A Supplemental Final Pretrial Conference will be set at a later date. Court in Recess: 9:52 a.m. Hearing concluded. Total time in court: 01:21 * To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?