Doll et al v. Kaz USA, Inc. et al
Filing
181
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Final Pretrial Conference held on 6/14/2011. A Supplemental Final Pretrial Conference will be set at a later date. taking under advisement 159 Motion to strike the letters p roduced with plaintiffs sixteenth and nineteenth supplemental Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures. taking under advisement 164 Defendants motion to take the depositions of Shannon Doll and Tara Smith. taking under advisement 167 Defendants motion to strike plaintiff Shirley Doll Kochs supplemental answer to defendants first set of interrogatories. (FTR: G.Mattei) (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
U.S. MAGISTRATE BOYD N. BOLAND
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02976-LTB-BNB
Courtroom Deputy: Geneva D. Mattei
Date: June 14, 2011
FTR BNB COURTROOM A 401
SHIRLEY DOLL, and
JIMMIE KOCH,
W. Randolph Barnhart
Stephen Kaufman
Plaintiff(s),
v.
KAZ USA, INC., and
KAZ, INC.
Mark Harris
Rusty Miller
Laura Hass
Defendant(s).
COURTROOM MINUTES
FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE and MOTIONS HEARING
Court in Session:
8:31 a.m.
Appearance of counsel.
Court’s initial comments.
Argument presented.
ORDERED: Motion to strike the letters produced with plaintiffs’ sixteenth and nineteenth
supplemental Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures [doc.#159; filed 5/23/11] is taken under
advisement.
ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to take the depositions of Shannon Doll and Tara Smith
[doc. #164; filed 5/26/11] is taken under advisement.
ORDERED: Defendants’ motion to strike plaintiff Shirley Doll Koch’s supplemental answer
to defendants’ first set of interrogatories [doc. #167; filed 6/2/11] is taken under
advisement.
ORDERED: A Supplemental Final Pretrial Conference will be set at a later date.
Court in Recess:
9:52 a.m.
Hearing concluded.
Total time in court: 01:21
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?