Doll et al v. Kaz USA, Inc. et al

Filing 69

ORDER. The Defendants Motion for Protective Order 51 is DENIED; The Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order 53 is DENIED; and The Motion to Strike 65 is DENIED. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/30/2010.(sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 09-cv-02976-LTB-BNB SHIRLEY DOLL KOCH, and JIMMIE KOCH, Plaintiffs, v. KAZ USA, INC., and KAZ, INC., Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following: (1) Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Regarding F.R.C.P. 30(b)(6)

Depositions of Kaz, Inc. and Kaz, USA, Inc. and Deposition of Walt Birdsell [Doc. # 51, filed 8/13/2010] (the "Defendants' Motion for Protective Order"); (2) Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 53, filed 8/13/2010] (the

"Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order"); and (3) Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Supplement to Defendants' Response

to Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 65, filed 8/27/2010] (the "Motion to Strike"). I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. For the reasons stated on the record,

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) (2) (3) The Defendants' Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 51] is DENIED; The Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 53] is DENIED; and The Motion to Strike [Doc. # 65] is DENIED.

Dated August 30, 2010. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge

2