Mason v. City of Manitou Springs

Filing 18

ORDER. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby amended to substitute the City of Manitou Springs as the named Defendant. Court accepts the City of Manitou Springs' submission to the jurisdiction of the Court and the City's waiver of formal se rvice. The terms of the settlement agreement attached to the above-referenced motion are hereby approved. All of Plaintiff's claims against the City of Manitou Springs are hereby dismissed with prejudice and this case and cause of action is dismissed with prejudice. By Judge David M. Ebel on 02/22/2010.(sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00048-DME-BNB JAMES MASON, Plaintiff v. MANITOU SPRINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendant. ORDER RE: JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE, FOR APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, AND FOR REDUCTION TO JUDGMENT THE COURT having reviewed the Joint Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, for Approval of Settlement Agreement, and for Reduction to Judgment, hereby orders as follows: 1. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby amended to substitute the City of Manitou Springs as the named Defendant; 2 The Court accepts the City of Manitou Springs' submission to the jurisdiction of the Court and the City's waiver of formal service; 3. The terms of the settlement agreement attached to the above-referenced motion are hereby approved and reduced to the following judgment: The City of Manitou Springs shall pay James Mason Four Thousand Dollars ($4,000.00) and shall provide Mr. Mason with ownership of Fetzi, the police dog, and related equipment not marked with City or Police Department information; 1 4. All of Plaintiff's claims against the City of Manitou Springs are hereby dismissed with prejudice and this case and cause of action is dismissed with prejudice. DATED this 22nd day of February, 2010 BY THE COURT: s/ David M. Ebel ____________________________________ United States Circuit Court Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?