Rudnick et al v. Bank of America, National Association et al

Filing 102

MINUTE ORDER granting 97 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. ; granting 98 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for Defendant Bank of America, N.A.. Attorney Donna Hope Bakalor and Susan Jean Hendrick withdrawn by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 5/24/2011.(erv, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 10-cv-00144-WJM-MJW MICHAEL D. RUDNICK and ANN K. SMITH RUDNICK, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, TRUSTEE UNDER THE POOLING AND SERVICE AGREEMENT DATED AS OF FEBRUARY 1, 2007, GSAMP TRUST 2007-NC-1; LITTON LOAN SERVICING, LP; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF DENVER COUNTY; and All Unknown Persons Who Claim Any Interest in the Subject Matter of this Action, Defendants. Defendants. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe It is hereby ORDERED that Attorney Donna H. Bakalor’s Motion to Withdraw (docket no. 97) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. Ms. Bakalor is withdrawn as counsel of record for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A. , Trustee Under the Pooling Agreement Dated as of February 1, 2007, GSAMP Trust 2007-NC-1. The Clerk of Court shall remove Attorney Donna H. Bakalor from the CM/ECF electronic notification list. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Attorney Susan J. Hendrick’s Motion to Withdraw (docket no. 98) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. Ms. Bakalor is withdrawn as counsel of record for Defendant Bank of America, N.A. as Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank, N.A. , Trustee Under the Pooling Agreement Dated as of February 1, 2007, GSAMP Trust 2007-NC-1. The Clerk of Court shall remove Attorney Susan J. Hendrick from the CM/ECF electronic notification list. Date: May 24, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?