Ridgell-Boltz v. Astrue et al

Filing 167

ORDER Deferring Rulings on 138 Motion for Attorney Fees and 150 Motion for Review of Costs: determination of these motions is deferred until the results of appeals have been determined or, alternatively, if no appeals are filed, the deferral is until the time for appeal has expired, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 10/3/2012.(rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 10-cv-00252-RPM LAURA RIDGELL-BOLTZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, United States Social Security Administration, Defendant. ORDER DEFERRING RULINGS ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND EXPENSES AND FOR REVIEW OF COSTS On July 17, 2012, the plaintiff filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses [138] seeking $320,000.00 in fees and expenses. The defendant filed an opposition [149] asserting that the requested amount is disproportionate to the results obtained. The plaintiff has also filed a motion for review of costs taxed [150]. The defendant responded to that motion [157]. The issues raised are also related to the results achieved in the trial. Because it is expected that both parties will be appealing this Court’s rulings in this case and that the outcome of those appeals will affect these issues, in the conservation of judicial resources, it is ORDERED that the determination of these motions is deferred until the results of appeals have been determined or, alternatively, if no appeals are filed, the deferral is until the time for appeal has expired. Dated: October 3rd, 2012 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?